About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
on to another bluff being called. >> sure. >> imagine a republican primary where rush limbaugh, sean hannity and mark levin run the debates. >> yes. >> if the rnc has its way it will become a reality. the conservative radio hosts are being looked at as the 2016 debate moderators. meanwhile the rnc is going to ban, not partner, with cnn and nbc from hosting presidential debates because of the networks plans to run hillary clinton themed biopics. the committee voted unanimously on friday to ex-clued the networks and while it was reported that fox was in talks with nbc to produce the mini series, "the new york times" now reporting the studio will not take part. according to the times cbs and fox networks passed on picking up the mini series. priebus defined the vote as part of a process to take back the primary process from the last cycle. >> i'm trying build a party that's year-round, fix a data and digital operation, a debate debacle i called a traveling circus. the fact of the matter is i've got to protect this party and our nominees. look, if you're not going to have 23 debates these guys a
who matter most of all in this debate is not rush limbaugh, hannity, it's not those conservative talk show hosts and entertainers, it's really people like sensenbrenner in the house, cantor who will decide whether or not this actually comes to a vote. he said back in june after the decision was handed down and also after he made a trip down to se salma, he thought he could work out a deal, a bipartisan deal. he's been talking to kirsten gillibrand. you imagine those folks probably will not vote for this, the reauthorization of the voting rights act or any more sort of preclearance because they feel like it would stigmatize their own backyard. >> here's the thing on that, though, here again, you've got this conundrum where you have all good work going on, believe everybody is sincere but then, again, they've got those dog whistle politics going on, stoking up their own base against what they say they're trying to work on. >> this is a catch 22, right? which is we need bipartisan support, especially in the house to get this through. we can't frame this exclusively as an i.d. debate. if
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)